Manitoba's
Nocturnal Owl Survey:
2001 Progress Report
Prepared by Heidi E. den Haan
Our Purpose and the Value of Your Participation
Birds of prey, including the
mysterious and majestic owls, are high on the food chain and
as such are vulnerable to environmental change brought on by
our modern activities. These changes can include toxins in
their food supply, absence of food and the absence of
nesting and hunting grounds, otherwise known as habitat
loss. This survey seeks to provide sound information on owl
distribution, habitat use, abundance and population trends.
This will lay the groundwork for the development of sound
conservation strategies by identifying species in need and
by providing a tool for evaluating current management
programs. An equally important survey goal is to provide an
opportunity for people such as yourselves to get involved
through active participation. We could not do all this
without you!
Where We Surveyed in 2001
In
2001, 57 routes were surveyed (slightly less than the year
before) and are displayed on the map shown to the right.
Routes at Spruce Siding (near Richer), Fire Road 31 South
(near Hadashville), Glenboro-Stockton and Athapap Road (near
Cranberry Portage) have all been done 2 or more times in
2001.
The map is divided into regions known as 'Bird
Conservation Regions' (BCR), accepted widely in North
America as the planning unit for bird conservation studies.
(Click map for larger version.)
The survey is getting better with increasing
representation in the western part of the province. To get
accurate representation of owl populations throughout
Manitoba we need more volunteers in the north and west! If
you can help out, let us know! Every little bit helps!
Charts
As most of you know, the survey protocol changed
significantly in the year 2000. Route length, spacing
between listening stations and listening time all changed
and as well, the playback was dropped. The change was made
in order to standardize the methods across Canada and become
part of a nation-wide owl survey. As such, the owl detection
trends from the two sampling periods are separated in Graphs
1 & 2.
 
These charts show the number of each owl species heard
per kilometer surveyed during the 11-year survey period.
(Click graphs for larger
versions.)
Interesting
Factoids 2001...
* In 2001, 57 routes were surveyed by 91 volunteers, down
slightly from 59 Routes in 2000. For every station surveyed,
0.27 owls were heard which was up slightly up from 2000 when
0.24 were heard for every station surveyed. This means that
surveyors have a greater than 25% chance of hearing an owl
at a station. (Click pie chart for larger
version.)
* For every 1 km surveyed, 0.17 owls were heard, up from
2000 when 0.15 were heard for every 1 km surveyed. That
equals one owl for every 5.88 km traveled during the
survey.
* Boreal Owls were the most commonly encountered (54 on
14 routes) followed by Great-Horned Owls (47 on 17 routes)
and Northern Saw-whet Owls (29 on 15 routes). At least one
owl was reported from 39 of the 57 routes surveyed.
* Rudolf Koes and Reto Zach struck gold on Route 4 (Bird
River - PR 315) near Nopiming National Park with 13 owls
heard (all Boreal Owls).
* Donna Danyluk, Ian Ward, Francois and Dana Blouin were
fortunate as well surveying routes 1 (Powerview North) and
35 (314 - Nopiming - Cat Lake) which were not far behind
each recording 10 owls.
* Four Boreal Owls, five Northern Saw-whet Owls and one
Northern Hawk Owl were recorded at Powerview despite
problems with traffic (thank you Donna and Ian for your
perseverance and patience), and 10 Boreal Owls were recorded
at Cat Lake.
* Route 131 (Vogar West), surveyed by Georgina and
Raymond Larson, was close behind with nine owls reported
(seven Great Horned Owls and two Great Grey Owls).
The New Survey Protocol
In the year 2000 the protocol for Manitoba's Nocturnal
Owl Survey was changed dramatically in order to be part of
the international standard for monitoring owls in North
America. By using one common protocol across Canada and the
U.S., we will be better able to monitor owl population
trends across broad geographic areas, similar to that done
by the Breeding Bird Survey.
Briefly, the major changes for 2000 were:
|
* 2 minute silent listening period per station
with no tape playback
|
* 1.6 km spacing between stations
|
|
* routes in multiples of 10 stations each
|
* random route locations
|
FAQs
- Question: Can I create my own route?
- Answer: As tempting as it is to survey in an
area where owls are known to be abundant, if everyone did
this than we would not get an accurate picture of the
distribution and abundance of the different species of
owls in our province. Because this is a scientific study
and because we are attempting to create a standard
protocol across Canada one rule we must conform to is
that the routes be randomly distributed. The good news is
there is some leeway in that you are given a choice
between three possible routes to survey. I suspect that
some of you may hear no owls at all. Although your
disappointment is understandable, remember that even this
data is valuable to the understanding of the owls'
ecology. So take heart! And keep up the good work.
- Question: Why are the listening stations
spaced at 1.6 km (1 mile)?
- Answer: We are adopting a standard spacing of
1.6 kms in Canada for two main reasons; 1) this distance
reduces double counting of owls, and hence makes more
efficient use of your time; and 2) if we were to use a
playback at some point to target a certain species,
spacing of 1.6 km reduces the influence of the playback
on the next stop.
- Question: Can I reduce the space between
stations to fit more stations in a route?
- Answer: We strongly recommend the minimum
spacing of 1.6 km be maintained. If noise is a problem at
a particular station, it can be moved slightly (100 m).
However, so as not to alter the distance of the full
route, measure your subsequent station 1.6 km from where
this station was originally to be. The important feature
is that the locations remain consistent from year to
year, allowing for significant long term monitoring.
- Question: Is it essential that my route have
10 stops?
- Answer: Yes! Your route should have a minimum
of 10 stops. The 10 stop route forms the basis for
population monitoring and is an essential part of the
study allowing for cross analysis of the data collected
between routes. If you so choose, you can double your
route to 20 stops, adding to the pool of data and
doubling your fun!
- Question: Why are there so many information
sheets to fill out?
- Answer: There has been a significant increase
in the amount of forms to fill out. We are entering all
this information into our database to make things easier
in the future. Once you have filled out the surveyor
information (name, address, etc.) you will not have to do
so again, the same is true for the survey route
information. The route description and map are essential
should you stop doing the survey and your route is passed
on to someone new.
Manitoba
Owls Species Profile:
Northern Hawk Owl (Surnia ulula)
By Jim and Patsy Duncan
0ne of the least-studied birds of North America,
the Northern Hawk Owl has a bold nature and seems
to lack fear of humans, delighting birders, who
often travel great distances to observe it. It is
atypical in morphology and behavior compared to
other northern hemisphere owls, resembling in many
ways the accipiter hawks - hence the name Hawk Owl.
Primarily diurnal, this species usually perches
atop prominent trees. When flying, it either glides
low over the ground at high speed or flaps its
pointed wings in deep, powerful, falcon-like
strokes. (Picture at right: Patsy Duncan holding a
recently banded Northern Hawk Owl near South
Junction Manitoba.)
The
only species in its genus, the Northern Hawk Owl
breeds in the circumpolar boreal forest zone from
Alaska eastward through Newfoundland, and from
Scandinavia through Siberia. It nests in dead tree
stubs or woodpecker holes, especially in open
coniferous or mixed coniferous, deciduous forests,
burned over areas, or muskeg. Although this owl
winters throughout its breeding range, it
periodically "invades" southern Canada and the
northern United States. The magnitude and extent of
these winter irruptions are thought to correlate
with high reproductive success followed by severe
winter conditions and decreased prey availability.
Early studies suggest that this owl eats primarily
small rodents, but recent evidence indicates that
grouse, ptarmigan, and hares comprise a greater
proportion of their diet than previously
thought.
All North American owls, except the Burrowing
Owl (Speotyto cunicularia), show appreciable
reversed sexual size dimorphism - the female is
larger than the male. However, this dimorphism is
not strongly pronounced in the Northern Hawk Owl.
Despite its lack of skeletal ear asymmetry, it can
locate and capture concealed prey up to 30 cm under
snow cover. While much remains to be learned of the
natural history of this species on its breeding
range, there is no evidence that this species is at
risk.
Northern Hawk Owl and Boreal Owl (above) images,
courtesy Anne Cook. For more great owl images
visit: Digital
Bird Photographs
|
More Bird Related Volunteer Opportunities in
Manitoba
Delta Marsh Birding Festival
|
May 10-12, 2002. The Delta Marsh Birding
Festival is a 3-day event for birders and bird
lovers alike celebrating the diversity and wonder
of birds! Delta has unique and wonderful birding
opportunities with experts in all aspects of
birding life. We hope you can join us for this
celebration of bird life during the peak of spring
migration at Delta:
|
|
* shorebird and waterfowl identification
|
* guided bird tours to various habitats
|
|
* birding by ear
|
* birding by canoe
|
|
* visits to Sharptail Grouse dancing grounds
|
* banquet with keynote speaker Jim Duncan
|
|
* fish fry and silent auction
|
* bird banding
|
|
* Mother's Day picnic
|
For more information call Russ Mead at 857-8637
or fax at 857-4683.
|
|
Delta Marsh Bird Observatory:
www.dmbo.org
|
For information regarding conservation and wildlife in
Manitoba see: www.gov.mb.ca/natres/wildlife/index.html

Northern Saw Whet Owl
Thanks To All Participants
Thank you to all participants of the 2001 Owl Survey
veterans and new comers alike! We couldn't do this without
you. Hats off to all those participants who surveyed more
than one route. Your extra effort is greatly
appreciated.
Owl Survey Participants in 2001
Cheryl Bailey, Jim Bell, Robert Berger, Francois and Dana
Blouin, Mark Bodnar, James Bradley, Tim Byers, Dan
Chranowski, Ward Christianson, Jack Crolly, Carolyn Curtis,
Cal Cuthbert, Donna Danyluk, Buster Day, Jim, Patsy, Connor
and Brooke Duncan, Jim Fisher, Foster Fournie, Maureen
Frolick, Mike Gigian, Jeff Gowler, Harry Harris, Heather
Hinam, George Holland, Wally Jansen, Louise Kernatz, Ken
Kingdon, Rudolf Koes, Bill Koonz, Michaela Kraft, Georgina
Larson, Raymond Larson, Patrice Letain, Matt Loewen, Kurt
Mazur, Alex McIlraith, Celia McLaren, Don and Ardythe
McMaster, Marilyn Meyer, Al Mickey, Lorelie Mitchell, Wayne
Neily, Dayle Neufeld, Lory and Audrey Neufeld, Jeremiah
Niekamp, Laura Pearson, Morley Pedwell, Charlotte Pedwell,
Ray Pettinger, Barb Pettinger, Leon Pewarchuk, Aimee Pittet,
Ryan Porteus, Bill Pruitt, David Raitt, Amelia Reid, Monica
Reid-Wrong, Don and Roxie Reimer, Vic Reimer, Marlene
Remple, Dave Roberts, Len Ryzner, Tom Scott, Rosalie
Sigurdson, Connie Singleterry, Bob Smith, Isabelle Smith,
Richard Staniforth, Diana Staniworth, Peter Taylor, Ross
Teague, Lorna Teague, Lisa and Wes Tretiak, Will Trowell,
Joanne Tuckwell, Jeff Turner, Lorraine Turner, Robyn and
Todd Underwood, Piet Van Dijken, Liis Veelma, Marlene
Waldron, Bill Walley, Ian Ward, Ted Wilson, Larry and Judy
Winslow, Margaret Yorke, Reto Zach and all friends and
family members we may have missed.
Thank you for your help with Manitoba's Nocturnal Owl
Survey and we hope you are looking forward to the 2002
survey!
Manitobas Nocturnal Owl Survey is supported
by:
|

|

|
|

|

Delta Marsh Bird Observatory
|
|