|
| Click the thumbnails to see
full size images. Close the image windows when you're done. |



|
 
With Doug Collicutt
As seen in the Winnipeg Free Press, Sunday
Magazine, Mar. 18, 2001.
Forest tent caterpillars creepy, not harmful.
"To spray, or not to spray: that is the question;
whether tis nobler in real life to suffer the mess of outrageous
numbers of caterpillars, or to take up aerial spraying against this sea
of larvae, and by opposing end their defoliation." It's with apologies
to Mr. Shakespeare and some trepidation that I wade into the debate over
forest tent caterpillars (FTC's).
As a Whiteshell cottager, I endured the great
FTC outbreak of 2000. My family was undeterred by the caterpillars that
blanketed the park from May until late June. They were gone by July, only
the cocoons were left, and the forest had re-leafed completely by mid
July, so it wasn't like the whole summer was ruined. I can't say that
I enjoyed it, but neither was I disgusted or appalled. A lot of people
deprived themselves of being at their cottages or campsites for much of
the early summer. I have little sympathy for them and their "entomophobia".
Initially, I supported Manitoba Conservation's decision to let the outbreak
run its course naturally. However, the more this issue was debated, the
more interested I became in the facts behind the controversy. Here's some
of what I found out.
FTC's are the larvae of the FTC moth, a native
species, widespread in North America. Their populations cycle over a 15-20
year period, occasionally exploding to defoliate large areas of forest.
The cause isn't well understood, but it may be a predator/prey relationship
that simply gets out of balance. Their chief predator is the flesh fly,
whose larvae eat the caterpillars. Whatever sets them off, in 2 or 3 years
FTC's can multiply to astronomical numbers, up to 10 million caterpillars
per ha. But the flesh fly is not far behind, it's numbers ballooning along
with its main food. In a year or two the flesh fly and other parasites
and diseases overtake the FTC's and send their numbers crashing back down.
Is there damage to the forest ecosystem? Not in
the long term. Aspens and other deciduous trees can be weakened by several
years of defoliation, but unless factors such as drought or other pests
compound there is little threat to the trees. The temporary hardship imposed
on the deciduous trees actually benefits young conifers and forest wildflowers
which receive extra sunlight and fertilizer (FTC poop). No North American
jurisdiction employs pesticide programs against forest tent caterpillars
for "forest protection" purposes.
That's not to say, however, that a control program
would not be effective. The biological agent, Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis,
a bacterium) is used to control other defoliating caterpillars. Studies
have shown that this short-lived agent is effective and relatively environmentally-friendly,
with little effect on overall insect biodiversity.
Therefore, a Bt spraying program isn't such a
bad thing, biologically speaking. Nor is letting the FTC outbreak run
its course. So, personally, I don't see this as a biological issue.
Enter the humans and their esthetic and economic
factors. The outbreak had an undeniable effect on park usage. I enjoyed
the increased peace and quiet in May and June, but local businesses felt
the pinch. And we were all left with a fair bit of work to clean up and
rid our cottages, sheds, bicycles and boats of the innumerable cocoons
left behind.
What would be the cost of a control program? Aerial
Bt aerial spraying costs about $50/ha. The Whiteshell District Association
contends it would be feasible to spray cottage subdivisions and a buffer
area for less than $150,000. To their credit, they suggest that individual
cottagers pay for the program with a $40 service fee. However, that leaves
Manitoba Conservation to pick up the tab for the rest of the high use
areas of the park. And, of course, if the province agrees to spray, they
set a precedent, and not just for the Whiteshell.
This could end up being a moot debate anyway.
It may already be too late to develop a program to spray this year. And,
with or without spraying, the problem will go away by itself in a year
or two. Personally, I think there are more pressing things for our government
to be concerned with, but if you feel strongly about this issue, one way
or the other, then let them know what you think. That's your right. |

|